,” the MEA said.“In order to streamline, liberalise and ease the process of issue of passport, the MEA has taken a number of steps in the realm of passport policy which is expected to benefit citizens of India applying for a passport,” the government said on Friday.New Delhi: In a significant change in the passport application rules that has raised eyebrows due to the ideological orientation of the ruling BJP, the Narendra Modi government has allowed “sadhus/sanyasis” (holy men/women) to apply for a passport with the name of their spiritual “guru” (teacher) listed in the application in lieu of the name of parents. This would enable single parents to apply for passports for their children and to also issue passports where the name of either the father or the mother is not required to be printed at the request of the applicant. This is expected to provide huge relief to single parents, specially single mothers.The external affairs ministry made a few other changes, including one that will no longer make it mandatory for passport applicants to fill in the names of both parents.

The changes were announced after the MEA accepted the recommendations of an inter-ministerial committee.”Also, mandatory submission of the birth certificate as a proof of date of birth has been waived for those whom it was a must till now.“Sadhus/sanyasis can apply for a passport with the name of their spiritual guru mentioned in the application in lieu of their biological parent(s) name(s), subject to their providing at least one public document such as Election Photo Identity Card (EPIC) issued by the Election Commission, PAN card, Aadhaar card, etc wherein the name of the guru is recorded against the column(s) for parent(s) name(s),” the MEA said. The committee gave its report, which was accepted by the MEA. ”As per statutory provisions of the Passport Rules 1980, all applicants born on or after 26/01/1989, in order to get a passport, had to, hitherto, mandatorily submit the birth certificate as the proof of date of birth (DOB).” It added: “The passport application form does not require the applicant to provide the name of her/his spouse in case of separated or divorced persons. After the sadhus petitioned the Government against this, a three-member committee that comprised officials of the MEA and women and child development ministry was constituted to examine various issues on passport application rules.

The passport application form now will not require the applicant to provide even “the name of her/his spouse in case of separated or divorced persons”, and applicants in such cases will not have to provide even the divorce decree as proof. It has now been decided that all applicants of passports can submit any one of the following documents as the DOB proof while submitting the passport application: birth certificate issued by the Registrar of Births and Deaths or municipal corporation or any other prescribed authority; transfer/school leaving or matriculation certificate issued by the school last attended; PAN card issued by the income-tax department with the DOB of applicant; Aadhaar card/E-Aadhar with the DOB of the applicant . Such applicants for passports would not be required to provide even the divorce decree.Officials said that till now, it was mandatory for sadhus and sanyasis to furnish the names of their parents in the passport application..In huge relief to single parents, specially single mothers, the MEA said: “The online passport application form now requires the applicant to provide the name of father or mother or legal guardian, (thus) only one parent, and not both. The change was made after sadhus petitioned the government on this, but it will be IP54 LED Bulkheads Manufacturers done only when the sadhus/sanyasis furnish at least one official document (like Aadhaar card, PAN card, etc) that already shows the guru’s name listed in the “column on the parent’s name”.

”Blaming New Delhi for the border tensions between India and China, Hu said, "India should bear all the consequences.The report quotes Chinese expert, Hu Zhiyong, saying, “The series of remarks from the Chinese side within a 24-hour period sends a signal to India that there is no way China will tolerate the Indian troops&LED Bulkheads Lights Manufacturers39; incursion into Chinese territory for too long.Beijing: As the standoff between two neighbouring countries enters its third month, the Chinese expert on Saturday said Beijing may conduct a ‘small-scale military operation to expel Indian troops within two weeks’ after six ministries and institutions made remarks on the incident within the past 24 hours.”The end for the Sikkim standoff is not seen on cards as China # is in complete denial for dialogue over the border issues unless India withdraws troop from the region which Beijing claims to be its territory. And no matter how the standoff ends, Sino-Indian ties have been severely damaged and strategic distrust will linger.

The spat worsened when China tried to build a road at the strategically important Chicken’s Neck area, also called as Doklam, which interestingly falls under disputed tri-junction land between India-Bhutan-China..”Read: Amid Sikkim standoff, China holds advance military exercise near Arunachal PradeshAddressing the parliament on the standoff, External Affairs minister Sushma Swaraj on Thursday asserted that war was not a solution and that it would be wise to resolve the issue diplomatically.Another expert, Zhao Gancheng, director of the Center for Asia-Pacific Studies at the Shanghai Institute for International Studies, said, “The exercises are a sign that China could use military means to end the standoff and the chances of doing so are increasing as the Indian side is still saying one thing and doing another.”Read: Sikkim standoff: Our restraint has 'bottom line', China tells IndiaHu, a research fellow at the Institute of International Relations of the Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences, said, “If India refuses to withdraw, China may conduct a small-scale military operation within two weeks".

According to a report in Chinese state-run, Global Times, two ministries and four institutions, including the Chinese foreign ministry, the defence ministry, the Chinese Embassy in India and the People's Daily, released statements on the military standoff between China and India in Doklam.”Mentioning the earlier military drills by the People’s Liberation Army in the Tibetan region near the standoff area, the expert also drew a point that the drill was to warn Indian side that China is ready to give a befitting reply if needed.”Highlighting that the war would worsen the relations between the two neighbouring countries, Zhao said, “If current standoff ends in a military clash, bilateral ties would suffer for at least five years, and India may stir up troubles with China, which may cause tensions among China's other neighbours.Hu also said the military operation would aim to seize Indian personnel illegally lingering in Chinese territory or to expel them adding that “the Chinese side will inform the Indian Foreign Ministry before its operation.”Stating that the patience of China and its public is wearing thin, Zhao said, “China does not want dispute to impact the upcoming BRICS summit in September which will be attended by India in Xiamen, East China's Fujian Province. The report however, said she refrained from saying that “military readiness is always there as the military is meant to fight wars

Sources said that several BAC members from the Opposition sought a two days extension of the current session to discuss the Aadhaar Bill, also known as Aadhaar (Targetted Delivery of Financial and Other Subsidies, Benefits and Services) Bill 2016.Sources pointed out that if the bill goes in for discussion in Rajya Sabha, then chances are that the security aspect may get sharply scrutinised. Meanwhile, the bill itself is being closely scrutinised in political as well as social circles, primarily owing to the fact that just like its predecessor — the UPA’s National Identification Authority of India Bill 2010 (which faced a lot of criticism from a Parliamentary panel and got lapsed after the expiry of the 15th Lok Sabha) — it does not make Aadhar number as mandatory proof of citizenship or domicile.Tathagata Satpathy, Biju Janata Dal (BJD) MP from Dhenkanal while speaking against the bill in the lower house said, “it (the bill) has been showcased as a tool exclusively meant for disbursement of subsidies and we do not realise that it can also be used for mass surveillance or, to take it a step further, to a very much more dangerous proposition for genetic or ethnic cleansing.

Though Mr Jaitley while citing chapters and sections of the bill dealing with secrecy and confidentiality of information, explained to the House that no biometric information will be shared with anyone and that it will be used only for the purpose of generation of Aadhar numbers and no other purpose and no information will be leaked out, doubts still remain on this aspect. This is in line with the UPA Bill, which the then government had to revise in October 2013 after the Supreme Court in September 2013 had questioned Aadhaar’s legal sanctity.Though the NDA Government on March 11 got the Aadhaar Bill, 2016, passed in Lok Sabha after converting it into a money bill, which in other words does not make it mandatory to seek Rajya Sabha’s consent, sources aware of the development said that it refused to heed to the request of the Opposition parties — who during the meeting of the Business Advisory Committee (BAC) of the Upper House on the same day sought an extension of the ongoing Budget session to discuss the legislation, fearing that it may face embarrassment in the Upper House owing to poor bench strength there.

However, the request was not accepted owing to NDA being in minority in Rajya Sabha.” He had sought to know from the Finance Minister Arun Jaitley whether the Government can give an assurance that the biometric data collected for Aadhar number “will not be mis-utilised”. Thus ip65 industrial lighting the bill seems to be contradictory in nature, as on one hand it does not make Aadhaar number as mandatory proof identity, while on the other hand, it plans to deliver subsidies to holders of such a number!Secondly and most importantly, several members in Lok Sabha during the discussion on the legislation on March 11 raised questions on the aspects of right to privacy of individuals. Interestingly, the point of debate here is that when Aadhaar is not a mandatory proof of identity, then why does the legislation’s objective says that it will provide for targetted delivery of subsidies through assigning of unique identity numbers to them.

These are not for outdoor use, as they don’t feature any kind of weatherproofing.In growing number of devices connecting to the internet, D-Link has revealed its new C2600 WiFi Router powered by McAfee (DIR-2680).D-Link CovrD-Link’s Covr brand has launched a couple of mesh networking devices – a dual-band, three pack system and a tri-band, two pack system. While most of your security cameras will probably have access to WiFi, this camera will connect to Verizon’s LTE network. Both routers support 4×4 MU-MIMO. This can be managed by two apps – the D-Link app and the McAfee Secure Home app.All the models to include smart roaming, which allows the transition between nodes without having to manually switch the connection and smart steering, which will automatically move connections between bands for optimum speeds.

The tri-band system offers AC2200 WiFi and is capable of covering 6,000 square feet, while the dual-band system provides wholesale ip65 waterproof light AC1200 WiFi to an area up to 5,000 square feet. Both cameras are capable of recording in 1080p to local storage or to the cloud, and both are compatible with third-party IoT services like Google Assistant, Alexa, and IFTTT. This tech helps to identify the malicious malware before it attacks the connected devices.5Gbps WAN port and four Gigabit LAN ports present on each router. These speeds can only be achieved by 2. A trio of routers, a mesh networking system and few security cameras were unveiled at CES 2018.D-Link AX6000Ultra WiFi Routers – AX6000 and the AX11000 were also displayed at the event.

The DIR-2680 also uses an Intel Home WiFi chipset, which can support up to 128 connected devices at once.D-Link LTE CameraComing to security cameras D-Link revealed their LTE Indoor/Outdoor Camera (DCS-1820LH). These cameras offer local or cloud recording along with support for Google Assistant, Alexa, and IFTTT.D-Link has come up with their new products line-up which includes routers and home security cameras. This protection gets better over time by its machine learning technology to identify the threats.D-Link HD CameraD-Link’s WiFi cameras, which are aimed at home monitoring are also displayed at the event.The LTE camera was announced alongside with the Wire-Free Indoor/Outdoor camera. The AX6000 is capable of achieving combined speeds of 6,000 Mbps and the latter up to 11,000 Mbps. To keep this connectivity safe, McAfee’s Global Threat Intelligence helps the connectivity secured and intact.